Skip to Content
Featured

Is It Legal to Sleep on L.A.’s Sidewalks? Yes, but No One Is Celebrating

11:52 AM PST on December 17, 2019

    Homeless in Skid Row. (Photo by by Philip Iglauer/LA Taco archive)

    [dropcap size=big]H[/dropcap]omeless advocates and people experiencing homelessness let out a sigh of relief as news broke Monday morning that the Supreme Court would not hear the Martin vs. Boise case, a landmark ruling that applies to all western states and grants people the right to sleep on the streets if there isn’t enough housing.

    This comes three months after the L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted to file an amicus brief in favor of appealing Martin vs. Boise. The motion passed with a 3-2 vote and left Supervisors Solis and Kuehl as the only representatives to oppose the motion.

    The decision to file the brief came at a time when the president suggested that L.A. should create camps to contain the homeless in addition to creating a statewide homeless “task force,” an idea that didn’t sit well with most homeless advocates and people experiencing homelessness. They argued that such a plan would lead to unhoused residents being further criminalized. The 9th district ruling in the Martin vs. Boise case found that arresting people for not having a place to live violated 8th amendment rights.

    In the amicus brief filed by the City of Los Angeles, the city argued that “Sweeping language brings uncertainty to the city’s duty to maintain its public spaces.” Mike Feuer, the Los Angeles City Attorney also filed a separate brief that said, “Boise’s rationale sweeps too broadly, and the opinion is internally inconsistent and unclear.”

    Had the Supreme Court overturned the ruling, the decision would have impacted cities across the country. For now, homeless people in L.A. are allowed to sleep on sidewalks between 9 PM and 6 AM because of a 2006 ruling. The agreement bars sitting or lying on the streets during the day. The reality, of course, is that on any given day or night, there are thousands of encampments set up across the city.

    Those in favor of the Martin vs. Boise decision argued that even if the Supreme Court overturned the ruling, there would be no way to realistically enforce such a ban. There is simply nowhere else for people living on the streets to go. Not only is L.A. the least affordable housing market in the country, but the city is also lagging on its 2016 promise to build 10,000 permanent supportive housing units in 10 years. None of those units have opened as of yet.

    Many see the Supreme Court’s decision as a bittersweet victory though, we still have a long way to go. Unhoused people are already routinely criminalized for violating the city’s “sit and sleep law,” L.A. Municipal Code 56.11, and other ordinances that unhoused residents say make it more difficult for them to get out of homelessness. 

    Despite evidence that says criminalizing the homeless doesn’t work, city legislators have routinely sided with housed residents that would rather not see the homeless crisis play out in their backyards.

    Earlier this year, LAHSA, the city’s lead agency when it comes to homelessness found that criminalization and encampment sweeps only push people further into homeless, “Fines and citations, encampment clearings and other municipal practices and policies that disrupt and displace people create additional barriers and setbacks for people experiencing homelessness, making it more likely that

    People will remain homeless even longer.”

    But the sweeps continue.

    In June of this year, the city launched the CARE program, a mayor-lead initiative to bring more services like bathrooms and even job opportunities to homeless encampments. These sweeps are carried out by L.A. Sanitation on a daily basis across parts of the city, but other sweeps go on as well, sweeps that leave homeless people in handcuffs and without vital supplies that they depend on and can help them get off the streets.

    Last week, nearly a dozen cops swarmed an encampment early in the morning to make way for a sweep on 4th Street near Shatto Place in Koreatown, according to advocates with Street Watch L.A., a homeless outreach group that monitors sanitation sweeps. The unhoused residents of the encampment were ticketed and detained momentarily for having their tents up during the day.

    Yesterday Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas tweeted, “Supporting the City of Boise’s position to appeal to the Supreme Court was never an attempt to criminalize the homeless; rather it was a pursuit of a legal framework that is clear—in comparison to a status quo that is ambiguous and confusing.” 

    This was a major win for homeless advocates and people experiencing homelessness but nobody is celebrating.

    In actuality, criminalization is central to the Martin vs. Boise case and the ruling clearly found that “as long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise that they had a choice in the matter.”

    Despite evidence that says criminalizing the homeless doesn’t work, city legislators have routinely sided with housed residents that would rather not see the homeless crisis play out in their backyards. The Supreme Court won’t hear the Martin vs. Boise case, but locally city leaders are still deciding whether or not to amend 56.11 and other laws that make it harder for homeless people to get off the streets and we’re still struggling to build housing. 

    This was a major win for homeless advocates and people experiencing homelessness but nobody is celebrating.

    Stay in touch

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    More from L.A. TACO

    What To Eat This Weekend: Cannabis-Infused Boat Noodles, Thai Smashburgers, and “Grass & Ass”

    Plus, a pizza festival and a respected chef from Toluca, Mexico comes to Pasadena to consult for a restaurant menu, including enchiladas divorciadas, and more.

    April 12, 2024

    Facing ‘Immediate Layoffs,’ L.A. TACO Launches Membership Drive to Save Our Publication

    After Sunday, we do not have enough money to make another payroll. We need 5,000 members to become sustainable. Our deadline is April 26th to hit this goal.

    April 12, 2024

    The Final Round of TACO MADNESS 2024 Is Now Open for Voting! It’s Highland Park vs. San Fernando Valley

    It was an incredible comeback to deny last year's winner and bring a first-timer from the San Fernando Valley to the finals. They will have an uphill battle against Villa's Tacos, who lead all teams in total votes so far in the 2024 competition. L.A.'s favorite taco will be decided on Sunday, April 14th, at 11:59 P.M. 

    April 11, 2024

    This New Koreatown Onigiri Spot Is Unlike Any Other in Southern California

    Supamu, which started as a food truck and a series of pop-ups, brands itself as Southern California’s first Okinawa-style onigiri. What sets its onigiri apart from competitors? All the details are in the post, plus where to find it.

    April 10, 2024

    When ‘Tomorrow’ Never Comes: The Saga of a DTLA Bar Staff’s Struggle To Get Paid

    A barback recalled a time when he had to use a payday loan app to cover a dinner bill. “How can you, with a straight face, hand someone a check knowing that there isn’t money in the account,” the barback questioned.

    April 10, 2024
    See all posts