Skip to Content
News

Supreme Court ‘Effectively Greenlights Racial Profiling,’ Permits Feds to Target Latinos

“Today, the highest court in the country ruled that the White House and masked federal agents can racially profile Angelenos with no due process, snatch them off the street with no evidence or warrant, and take them away with no explanation. This decision will lead to more working families being torn apart and fear of the very institutions meant to protect—not persecute—our people,” Mayor Bass continued.

2:00 PM PDT on September 8, 2025

Federal agents descend on MacArthur Park

Federal agents descend on MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on July 7, 2025. Photo by J.W. Hendricks for L.A. TACO.

On Monday, the Supreme Court lifted a restraining order barring federal immigration agents from stopping people solely based on their race, the language they speak, their job, or their location.

The decision gives federal agents the green light to continue “roving patrols” that have resulted in hundreds of immigrants—and even a few American citizens—being snatched off the streets at Home Depots, carwashes, and taco stands across the Los Angeles area in early June and July.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three liberal justices who dissented, called the decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor continued.

The federal government’s position on these raids “has all but declared that all Latinos, U.S. citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents’ satisfaction,” Sotomayor wrote.

The decision is another significant victory for President Donald Trump, who has promised to carry out the “largest mass deportation operation” in American history. However, the lawsuit is still in the early stages.

In a written statement, the ACLU SoCal noted that the Supreme Court’s request for a pause in the temporary restraining order “does not halt further proceedings in the case.”

“On September 24, the federal district court will hear arguments on whether to issue a preliminary injunction based on additional evidence of the government’s unlawful tactics,” ACLU SoCal wrote.

“When ICE grabbed me, they never showed a warrant or explained why,” Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, a plaintiff in the case, said in a written statement. “I was treated like I didn’t matter–locked up, cold, hungry, and without a lawyer. Now, the Supreme Court says that’s okay? That’s not justice. That’s racism with a badge.”

Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at ACLU SoCal, described Monday’s decision as “a devastating setback for our plaintiffs and communities who, for months, have been subjected to immigration stops because of the color of their skin, occupation, or the language they speak.”

“Today’s SCOTUS ruling puts farm workers—and every Californian who looks or sounds like they might be an immigrant—in greater danger,” said Teresa Romero, President of the United Farm Workers. “This does not impact immigrants in a vacuum; it will affect all of us. We will continue to seek a preliminary injunction in this case, and we will keep fighting for farm workers and all immigrant communities across the USA.”

In a statement, Mayor Karen Bass called the Supreme Court’s ruling “dangerous and un-American.”.

“I want the entire nation to hear me when I say this isn’t just an attack on the people of Los Angeles, this is an attack on every person in every city in this country. Today’s ruling is not only dangerous – it’s un-American and threatens the fabric of personal freedom in the United States of America,” the mayor said.

“Today, the highest court in the country ruled that the White House and masked federal agents can racially profile Angelenos with no due process, snatch them off the street with no evidence or warrant, and take them away with no explanation. This decision will lead to more working families being torn apart and fear of the very institutions meant to protect—not persecute—our people,” Mayor Bass continued.

More Stories

An Anarchist Feminist’s Personal Eulogy for Dolores Huerta

If a government sends choppers to silence a five-foot-tall woman, whatever she has to say must be dangerously important.

November 3, 2026

Escondido Resident Is 58th to Die in ICE Custody Under Trump Administration

Following Guillermo Pascual Verganza’s death at Otay Mesa Detention Center, his loved ones' nightmare only continued when an ICE press release confusingly misidentified him.

Investigations Newsletter: When Social Media Breaks the News of Your Friend’s Murder

Victories in this line of work are rare, and it often takes months, if not years, for a story to have an impact. This leaves a lot of time to wonder: What is the point?

November 2, 2026

Final Notice: Democrats Must Abolish ICE If They Win On Election Day

ICE was created in 2003. It is not some sacred U.S. institution tied to the Founding Fathers. Congress created it. Congress funds it. And Congress can dismantle it.

November 2, 2026

SGV Organizers Step Up to Stop Data Centers By Running Against the Politicians Who Failed Them

A 20-year-old Occidental College student and a florist from Rowland Heights are part of a new crop of political challengers arising in the San Gabriel Valley and they are prepared to give data centers hell.

November 2, 2026

Sunday Taquitos #36: The End Is Near

Sunday Taquitos! Art by Pulitzer Prize Finalist Ivan Ehlers.

November 1, 2026