Skip to Content
Art

Shepard Fairey Subject of Federal Criminal Investigation

2:01 AM PST on February 18, 2010

Copyrights and Campaigns blog reports:

Recently unsealed legal briefs filed by Shepard Fairey reveal that the Los Angeles artist is the "subject" of a federal criminal investigation for "potential violations" of laws prohibiting evidence tampering and perjury. According to a motion filed by Fairey seeking to postpone his deposition in the civil copyright dispute with the Associated Press over the "Obama Hope" poster, a federal grand jury is investigating whether Fairey violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c) and 1621. Section 1512 makes it a crime to "corruptly...alter[], destroy[], mutilate[], or conceal[] a record, document, or other object, or attempt[] to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or...otherwise obstruct[], influence[], or impede[] any official proceeding, or attempts to do so."

The AP believes that this is all just legal flim-flammery by the Fairey legal team and that the Federal investigation has no bearing on their suit against him:

The AP's basic argument is that Fairey's troubles are entirely of his own making, and that "[f]or Mr. Fairey now to point to the government's investigation of his own misconduct as grounds for a discovery extension...is truly the definition of chutzpah."

Also in the legal brief is information that Fairey's lawyers believe he will face indictment in the AP case because of his choice to not incriminate himself in the Government case.

And in a rather extraordinary passage, Fairey concedes that he likely faces sanctions in the civil case for his admitted wrongdoing and may face indictment:

Mr. Fairey has already admitted engaging in misconduct and accepts that he will face sanctions by the Court at a later stage of this case. But his error, however serious, should not force him to choose between abandoning his Fifth Amendment rights and forfeiting his right to testify in this civil action and to defend the action on the merits. Of course, the Court can impose sanctions upon Mr. Fairey if it deems them appropriate, and the U.S. Attorney can choose to file criminal charges against him.

"But," he argues, "the triple punishment of potentially crippling civil liability — based not on the merits, but on his inability to testify during this particular brief period — would be unjust."

It's all extremely complicated, and must be costing both parties a shit-ton of money to battle in court over a photograph that was turned into a campaign poster.

More Stories

An Anarchist Feminist’s Personal Eulogy for Dolores Huerta

If a government sends choppers to silence a five-foot-tall woman, whatever she has to say must be dangerously important.

November 3, 2026

Escondido Resident Is 58th to Die in ICE Custody Under Trump Administration

Following Guillermo Pascual Verganza’s death at Otay Mesa Detention Center, his loved ones' nightmare only continued when an ICE press release confusingly misidentified him.

Investigations Newsletter: When Social Media Breaks the News of Your Friend’s Murder

Victories in this line of work are rare, and it often takes months, if not years, for a story to have an impact. This leaves a lot of time to wonder: What is the point?

November 2, 2026

Final Notice: Democrats Must Abolish ICE If They Win On Election Day

ICE was created in 2003. It is not some sacred U.S. institution tied to the Founding Fathers. Congress created it. Congress funds it. And Congress can dismantle it.

November 2, 2026

SGV Organizers Step Up to Stop Data Centers By Running Against the Politicians Who Failed Them

A 20-year-old Occidental College student and a florist from Rowland Heights are part of a new crop of political challengers arising in the San Gabriel Valley and they are prepared to give data centers hell.

November 2, 2026

Sunday Taquitos #36: The End Is Near

Sunday Taquitos! Art by Pulitzer Prize Finalist Ivan Ehlers.

November 1, 2026