Skip to Content
Media

Is ‘I Love L.A.’ the Kind of Show L.A. Really Deserves?

For a show named after loving the city, let's hope season two can actually love the city a little more for who and what it is, not for just what it appears to be on cellphones.

1:22 PM PST on December 8, 2025

Three stars from I Love LA talking in front of a fence while holding coffee, in a still from the show

Photograph by Kenny Laubbacher/HBO

Long before Hollywood’s cameras framed Los Angeles as a dream world, our city was a proving ground for hope, reinvention, and a framework for who the U.S. allows to be seen and endowed with opportunities. 

From Black southerners migrating west in the early half of the 20th century, to Central Americans escaping the terrors of civil wars at home in its later half, Los Angeles has stood as a place of survival, renewal, and safety, even despite their confrontations with a new breed of pressures and struggles in L.A.

The new HBO series I Love L.A. imagines the city through a narrow lens of arrival and aspiration, yet within that gloss lies an old story: of who gets to belong to the myth of Los Angeles, and who must labor, unseen, to sustain it. 

But what is an L.A. show and what we should demand, and not simply ask for, when we want to see the city on screen?

Los Angeles looks familiar in I Love L.A.: the sunsets, the studios, the promise that somewhere west of the 110 Freeway, a new life waits to begin. 

True Whitaker. Photograph by Kenny Laubbacher/HBO.
Rachel Sennott. Photograph by Morgan Maher/HBO.