Skip to Content
News

U.S. 4th Circuit Allows State Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Adults ‘To Appreciate Their Sex’

The 4th Circuit has become the first federal appeals court to enforce laws restricting gender-affirming surgeries. “It is not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens to appreciate their sex and not become disdainful of their sex,” Judge Julius Richardson said.

5:00 PM PDT on March 12, 2026

three judges, two women and one man

Judges of the Fourth Circuit Court including Julius Richardson (middle) who was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2018. Photo courtesy of United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

On March 10, in a first-of-its-kind ruling, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals escalated attacks  on transgender individuals by upholding West Virginia’s restriction on surgical procedures that aid in gender affirmation, setting a precedent for other states to follow suit.

According to Reuters, more than a dozen U.S. states currently prohibit or limit the use of Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming care, and the 4th Circuit has become the first federal appeals court to enforce that type of law. 

The specific surgeries and procedures the West Virginia law seeks to remove from Medicaid coverage includes physical alterations that align with one’s gender identity such as chest reconstruction and facial procedures.

Lewis F. Powell Jr. United States Courthouse. Photo courtesy of Acroterion/Unsplash.

This unanimous decision, coming from a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, overturned a 2024 decision ruling the statute as discriminatory and a constitutional violation. The 4th Circuit panel argued that the law applies to specific procedures, not specific individuals, and does not illegally discriminate against transgender people.

In the 35-page ruling, Trump-appointee Judge Julius Richardson wrote, “It is not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens to appreciate their sex and not become disdainful of their sex by refusing to fund experimental procedures that may have the opposite effect.”

The Federal Trade Commission, which enforces consumer protection laws, is investigating medical groups over their support for gender-affirming ​treatments, an action the groups are calling unlawful retaliation for their constitutionally protected speech.

More Stories

Sunday Taquitos #37: Super Shredder

Sunday Taquitos! Art by Pulitzer Prize Finalist Ivan Ehlers.

November 15, 2026

Muscoy’s Stacked Street Food Scene Is Proof that the Inland Empire Deserves More Love

Nestled between the 210 and 215 freeways, one of the I.E.’s smallest cities serves up big taste and big portions in equal measure.

November 14, 2026

Try Mexico City’s El Tigre Silencioso Before One of Mexico’s Best Chefs Opens His Arts District Restaurant Next Week

El Tigre chef and owner David Hussong is preparing to debut his own Baja seafood concept in the Arts District next week. But you can try his chiles gueros tacos before everyone else.

November 13, 2026

Lynwood Community Wants Answers After Photo Shows LASD Deputy and ICE Agent Shaking Hands

The city of Lynwood says the L.A. Sheriff's Department denied that any ICE activity took place, but photos show otherwise.

November 13, 2026

ICE WATCH: The Emotional Toll of Interviewing Detainees As an Immigration Reporter

There is no clocking off as an immigration reporter under this presidential administration.

November 12, 2026

Our 20 Favorite Diners in Los Angeles

Where your plates are piled high with hash browns and eggs, and your coffee mugs are always full. These diners have something for everyone while emanating a deep sense of comfort.

November 12, 2026