Skip to Content
News

U.S. 4th Circuit Allows State Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Adults ‘To Appreciate Their Sex’

The 4th Circuit has become the first federal appeals court to enforce laws restricting gender-affirming surgeries. “It is not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens to appreciate their sex and not become disdainful of their sex,” Judge Julius Richardson said.

5:00 PM PDT on March 12, 2026

three judges, two women and one man

Judges of the Fourth Circuit Court including Julius Richardson (middle) who was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2018. Photo courtesy of United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

On March 10, in a first-of-its-kind ruling, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals escalated attacks  on transgender individuals by upholding West Virginia’s restriction on surgical procedures that aid in gender affirmation, setting a precedent for other states to follow suit.

According to Reuters, more than a dozen U.S. states currently prohibit or limit the use of Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming care, and the 4th Circuit has become the first federal appeals court to enforce that type of law. 

The specific surgeries and procedures the West Virginia law seeks to remove from Medicaid coverage includes physical alterations that align with one’s gender identity such as chest reconstruction and facial procedures.

Lewis F. Powell Jr. United States Courthouse. Photo courtesy of Acroterion/Unsplash.

This unanimous decision, coming from a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, overturned a 2024 decision ruling the statute as discriminatory and a constitutional violation. The 4th Circuit panel argued that the law applies to specific procedures, not specific individuals, and does not illegally discriminate against transgender people.

In the 35-page ruling, Trump-appointee Judge Julius Richardson wrote, “It is not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens to appreciate their sex and not become disdainful of their sex by refusing to fund experimental procedures that may have the opposite effect.”

The Federal Trade Commission, which enforces consumer protection laws, is investigating medical groups over their support for gender-affirming ​treatments, an action the groups are calling unlawful retaliation for their constitutionally protected speech.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More Stories

Are The Lakers Still L.A.’s Team?

We asked some hardcore fans and the answer is somewhere between a theory that their latest purchase will get them ready to move the team to Vegas or using the Lakers as a pawn for political influence.

August 20, 2026

Who Won Last Night’s Debate Between Nithya Raman and Karen Bass?

The homeowners of the San Fernando Valley may have been the real winners in the end. Here are our thoughts.

August 20, 2026

The East L.A. Artist Behind ‘Homeboy Beautiful’ Magazine Has Championed Queer Chicano Liberation Since the 70s

You can catch artist Joey Terrill's pioneering work at a handful of active and upcoming exhibitions around L.A.

August 19, 2026

You See His Murals Across L.A. and at Your Favorite Restaurants. Now Meet the Painter

From Warsaw to the Inland Empire and now to Los Angeles, the artist’s fingerprints are figuratively and literally all over some of Downtown's most storied buildings. But the craziest part is that even "taggers don't hate on it," Mikołaj Wyszynski says.

August 18, 2026

The Ten Most Shocking Movie Scenes Ever Shot in L.A., Ranked

Spoilers ahead! From Malibu to Boyle Heights, from the Valley to San Pedro, here's our guide to the locations from ten shocking movie scenes filmed in L.A.

August 18, 2026

Sunday Taquitos #31: “For Sale: Basketball Team, Never Won” (Plus Bonus Taquitos!)

Sunday Taquitos! Art by Pulitzer Prize Finalist Ivan Ehlers.

August 16, 2026